Randomness and Pattern: Social and Philosophical Perspective
Khabibullina Zilya Nailovna

Khabibullina Zilya Nailovna, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Department of Philosophy and Political Science, Bashkir State University, 32 Z. Validi str., Ufa, Bashkortostan, Russian Federation.
Manuscript received on 11 August 2019. | Revised Manuscript received on 14 August 2019. | Manuscript published on 30 September 2019. | PP: 4526-4529 | Volume-8 Issue-3 September 2019 | Retrieval Number: C6818098319/2019©BEIESP | DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.C6818.098319
Open Access | Ethics and Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Abstract: Themodernpictureoftheuniverseisalmostcompletelydescribedbyanumberoffundamentalscientifictheories. However, despite the presence of patterns that perfectly explain almost all the observed natural phenomena, the manifestation of random deviations remains a big problem. If, prior to the beginning of the twentieth century, each new theory relied on a solid experimental and factual foundation, today, probability has become an integral element, having a genuinely philosophical implication, for science. This article attempts to uncover the relationship between the accidental and the natural in terms of the natural course of development of philosophical ideas about necessity and chance.
Keywords: Randomness in Science, the Paradigm of Necessity for Democritus, the Paradigm of Epicurus, Positivism, Determinism, Self-Organization, Synergetics.

Scope of the Article:
Pattern Recognition