The Pattern of Interruption in Indonesia Court Room
Aan Widodo1, Dadang Rahmat Hidayat2, Anter Venus3, Sigid Suseno4

1Aan Widodo, Faculty of Communication, Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya University, Jakarta, Indonesia.
2Dadang Rahmat Hidayat, Faculty of Communication, University of Padjadjaran. Bandung, Indonesia.
3Anter Venus, Faculty of Communication, University of Padjadjaran. Bandung, Indonesia.
4Sigid Suseno, Faculty of Law, University of Padjadjaran. Bandung, Indonesia.
Manuscript received on 27 June 2019 | Revised Manuscript received on 10 July 2019 | Manuscript Published on 17 July 2019 | PP: 506-512 | Volume-8 Issue-2S July 2019 | Retrieval Number: B10760782S19/2019©BEIESP
Open Access | Editorial and Publishing Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (

Abstract: This research aims to explain the pattern of interruptions in the trial in courtroom as a form of communication and culture. This research study addresses the question: how the depiction and interrupt patterns as a form of communication in the Central Jakarta District Court?. This study used ethnographic of communication methods. The results of this study showed that the interruptions made by both the prosecution and legal advisors. Interruptions occurred in the agenda of the defendant or witness examination. Usually, interruptions made to reject information submitted by each party in the proceedings. Interruptions marked by a show of hands, with the purpose of applying for permission from the judge, and then issue a request for the words to refute or information of others.
Keywords: Interrupt, Communication, Trial.
Scope of the Article: Pattern Recognition